First of all, it's not text from the back cover. If it was, I surely would have bothered to read the entire book as well...
Secondly, I'm planning on reading the book soon enough, so the page will get a proper update.
Radi0n 06:11, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
I can respect that. The problem is that the article reads like a back-of-the-book summery, and should have actually been researched before it was written. Sincerely, Watcher.
That's the whole point, the page was created before its release, so in order to keep the page going, I added a synopsis that I found online.
And might I add, it's not bad at all, even if it reads like the back-of-the-book summary. Radi0n 13:37, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
Well, even if the page was written before the novel came out, it's been out for about 4 months by now. Someone around here should have read it and provided a rewriting that keeps up with the release of the book, not just keeping it frozen like it was when it was created. Thus, why I brought the issue up in the first place. Sincerely, Watcher.
I've edited the article to what it needs to be. Now, somebody fix it or leave it like that. What was there before was unprofessional, and didn't need to be there. Sincerely, Watcher.
The article was fine just the way it was. Period. KratosGodofWar (Radi0n) 00:11, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
The Book is a good recreation of playing the game but does not add too much as far as storyline. The second book is supposed to contain more as Sony has granted more creative control to the author.The Crackman 19:44, June 7, 2012 (UTC)